In June, 2014, my book, entitled Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs: Keys to Understanding and Treating the Common Diseases was published by Elsevier. The book builds the argument that our best chance of curing the common diseases will come from studying and curing the rare diseases.
Over the past several weeks, I've been writing to several different blog sites on the subject of rare cancers. Here is a list of my rare disease posts, with links:
Developing Diagnostic Tests for Common Diseases: Role of the Rare Diseases
Rare Diseases Account for Subsets of Common Diseases
Phenocopy Mimics of Rare Diseases: Lessons for the Common Diseases
Phenocopy Diseases: Their Relationship to Rare Diseases and Common Diseases
What Rare Diseases Teach Us About the Cellular Basis of Aging
What is the Fundamental Biological Process that Causes Aging?
Wrinkling and Sagging are Chronic Toxic Processes Not Directly Caused by Aging
Disease Complexity: Rare Diseases and Common Diseases
Case Reports of Rare Diseases Have General Value
When Rare Diseases and Common Diseases Converge to Same Clinical Picture
Rare Diseases and Common Diseases can Converge to the Same Clinical Conditions
Rare Disease Legislation in the U.S.
Definition of Rare Disease
Developing Diagnostic Tests for Common Diseases: Role of the Rare Diseases
Rare Diseases Account for Subsets of Common Diseases
Improving Clinical Trials by Focusing on Rare Diseases
Rare Diseases of Unknown Origin
Rare Diseases are Sentinels for the Common Diseases
Biological Differences between Rare Cancers and Common Cancers
Rare Diseases are Biologically Different from Common Diseases
Rare Cancers are Biologically Different from Common Cancers
Rare Cancers
Clinical Trials and Rare Diseases
Rules for the Rare Diseases
The Rationale for Funding Rare Disease Research
New Book Explains the Importance of Rare Disease Research
I urge you to read more about this book. There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you think that you and your colleagues may benefit from reading this book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy of this book for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs, funding opportunities, rare cancers, common diseases, complex diseases, clinical trials, rare disease organizations, disease advocates
The Neoplasms blog covers tumor classification, tumor biology, and precancers. This blog site is intended to be a discussion forum for cancer researchers, pathologists, oncologists, healthcare professionals who provide services to cancer patients, and cancer funding administrators.
Showing posts with label orphan diseases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label orphan diseases. Show all posts
Monday, July 7, 2014
Monday, June 30, 2014
What's Wrong with Tumor Case Reports?
The Case Report (also known as Case Study) is a poorly utilized resource. Every healthcare worker is familiar with case reports; medical journals sometimes contain a section devoted to them. Case reports typically begin with a comment regarding the extreme rarity of the featured disease. You can expect to see phrases such as "fewer than a dozen have been reported in the literature" or "the authors have encountered no other cases of this lesion," or such and such a finding makes this lesion particularly uncommon and difficult to diagnose; and so on. The point that the authors are trying to convey is that the case report is worthy of publication specifically because it is rare. After describing the clinical and pathologic features of the case, there is usually some obligatory paragraph explaining how the disease can be distinguished from more common diseases, with which it may have overlapping clinical or pathological features. Sometimes the case report will contain an end-paragraph that undermines the accuracy of the start-paragraph, suggesting that the lesion is more common than one might think; implying here that under-diagnosis is the root cause of the lesion's apparent rarity. Always, the case report serves as a cautionary exercise, intended to ward against misdiagnosis.
The "beware this lesion" approach to case reporting can easily miss the most important aspect of this type of publication. Science, and most aspects of human understanding, involve generalizing from the specific. When Isaac Newton saw an apple falling, he was not thinking that he could write a case report about how he once saw an apple drop, thus warning others not to stand under apple trees lest a rare apple might thump them upon the head. Newton generalized from the apple to all objects, and questioned the basic nature of gravity, to produce mathematically-described laws by which gravity interacts with matter.
Every case report of a rare disease or of a rare presentation of a common disease should serve as a special instance of a general phenomenon. In natural systems, there are no outliers. Every event, no matter how rare, is produced as the consequence of general laws of nature. The case report gives us an opportunity to clarify the general way things work, by isolating one specific and rarely observed factor.
Much of what we know about common tumors has come from studying familial cases, and then testing to see if the same gene that caused the familial cases is also present in the sporadic cases. Here are a few examples, taken from my recently published book, Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs: Keys to Understanding and Treating the Common Diseases.
- Germline mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene are present in the rare Li–Fraumeni syndrome. A somatic p53 mutation is present in about half of all human cancers [28].
- Families with germline mutations of the KIT gene develop gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Somatic mutations of KIT occur in the majority of sporadic GIST tumors.
- Germline RET gene mutations occur in familial medullary carcinoma of thyroid, and in most cases of sporadic medullary carcinoma of thyroid [29,30].
- Germline RB1 gene mutations occur in familial retinoblastoma syndrome and in sporadic cases of retinoblastoma [31].
- Germline patched (ptc) gene mutations occur in basal cell nevus syndrome and in sporadically occurring basal cell carcinomas [32].
- Germline PTEN mutations occur in Cowden syndrome and Bannayan– Riley–Ruvalcaba syndrome, two inherited disorders associated with a high rate of endometrial carcinomas. PTEN mutations are found in 93% of sporadically occurring endometrial carcinomas [15].
In tumor after tumor, the genetic lesion present in sporadically occurring cancers would not have been found without prior knowledge of the syndromic gene (the gene responsible for the rare inherited condition). It would have been a terrible oversight if Li-Fraumeni syndrome, GISTs, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid, retinoblastoma, basal cell nevus syndrome, Cowden syndrome, and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome had merely served as rare case reports for the literature. Every rare disease should be accepted as an opportunity to find a cure for rare diseases and common diseases.
The process by which observations on rare diseases can be applied generally to all diseases, is discussed in detail in my recently published book, which builds the argument that our best chance of curing the common diseases will come from studying and curing the rare diseases.
I urge you to read more about this book. There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you like the book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: case report, case study, rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs, case studies, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, GISTs, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid, retinoblastoma, basal cell nevussyndrome, Cowden syndrome, Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome
Thursday, June 26, 2014
Orphanet Blog on my Rare Diseases Book
Orphanet has just posted a blog spot featuring my new book, entitled Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs: Keys to Understanding and Treating the Common Diseases
There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you like the book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy of this book for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: rare disease, rare disease research, rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs, blog post, orphanet
There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you like the book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy of this book for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: rare disease, rare disease research, rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs, blog post, orphanet
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Animal Models for Common Diseases (including cancer)
In June, 2014, my book, entitled Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs: Keys to Understanding and Treating the Common Diseases was published by Elsevier. The book builds the argument that our best chance of curing the common diseases will come from studying and curing the rare diseases.
Here is a short excerpt from Chapter 14.
“The proper study of Mankind is Man.”
—Alexander Pope in “An Essay on Man,” 1734.
Common diseases are complex, as is the response of humans to treatments for the common diseases. Are we likely to find adequate animal models for common diseases?
In the field of cancer research, carcinogens induce cancers in rodents, and the cancers that occur in rodents and humans share a set of fundamental properties: continuous growth, autonomous growth, invasiveness, metastasis (see Glossary item, Autonomous growth). Beyond these features, most animals models deviate from their human counterparts. Here just are a few examples:
I urge you to read more about this book. There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you like the book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy of this book for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: rare disease, animal models, carcinogenicity, cancer models, tumor models, drug development, drug trials, new drugs under development, rare disease research, rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs
Here is a short excerpt from Chapter 14.
“The proper study of Mankind is Man.”
—Alexander Pope in “An Essay on Man,” 1734.
Common diseases are complex, as is the response of humans to treatments for the common diseases. Are we likely to find adequate animal models for common diseases?
14.3.1 Rule—For the common diseases of humans, there are no adequate animal models.Rodents, especially mice and rats, are often used in disease research. Historically, the drug development process employs mouse models to identify candidate drugs for clinical trials in humans [20]. Few such mouse-inspired trials have shown success [21–24]. In a review of human clinical trials based on research data collected from mouse models, every one of 150 clinical trials of inflammatory responses in humans was a failure [20]. In the vascular field, there are animal models for stroke. Based on animal models, about 500 candidate drugs were proposed as neuroprotective agents in human stroke. Of the 500 candidate drugs, only two were shown to be of value for humans [23].
Brief Rationale—The common diseases are complex, the end result of many genetic and environmental factors. There is no reason to expect that a complex set of factors interacting in humans could be replicated in an animal.
In the field of cancer research, carcinogens induce cancers in rodents, and the cancers that occur in rodents and humans share a set of fundamental properties: continuous growth, autonomous growth, invasiveness, metastasis (see Glossary item, Autonomous growth). Beyond these features, most animals models deviate from their human counterparts. Here just are a few examples:
- Rodent tumors develop over a very short period of time, limited by the short life expectancy of the mouse or rat. A strong carcinogen can produce palpable mouse tumors in mere weeks. The commonly occurring tumors in humans require years to develop.
- In most strains of rodent, tumors lack molecular markers commonly found in human tumors (e.g., p53). The cytogenetic markers for rodent tumors are different from the cytogenetic markers for human tumors. In fact, the karyotype, physical mappings of genes, causal genes, and gene polymorphisms of rodent tumors are all quite different from human tumors (see Glossary items, Synteny, Haplotype).
- Animals metabolize drugs differently compared to humans.
- Viruses, bacteria, and other organisms that cause human cancer are different from the organisms causing cancer in animals.
- The diet of animals is different from the diet of humans.
- The host factors of animals, including immune status, are different from those of humans.
I urge you to read more about this book. There's a good preview of the book at the Google Books site. If you like the book, please request your librarian to purchase a copy of this book for your library or reading room.
- Jules J. Berman, Ph.D., M.D.
tags: rare disease, animal models, carcinogenicity, cancer models, tumor models, drug development, drug trials, new drugs under development, rare disease research, rare diseases, orphan diseases, orphan drugs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
